Gillian Norman aus Australien befasst sich als Filmemacherin auch mit 9/11. Sie ist besorgt, dass der APEC-Gipfel (bis 9.9.2007) in Sydney für "false flag"-Terror benutzt wird, um so einen Pretext für einen Angriff auf den Iran zu schaffen. Ein hermetisch abgeriegelter Tagungsort mag für sich genommen noch leider Normalität heute sein, doch scheinen sich die australischen Behörden konkret auf Anschläge vorzubreiten, und dann gibt es noch "war games" zur See bei Südafrika von NATO und Südafrika und zugleich das Treffen der Oberbefehlshaber der Armeen der NATO-Staaten in Kanada (beides 7.- 9.9. bzw. 6. - 9.9.). Jede/r kann sich anhand ihres hier leicht gekürzten Textes selbst eine Meinung bilden, ob sie die Dinge richtig kombiniert, doch sei noch auf zwei Nachrichten hingewiesen, die zu denken geben sollen:
Ende August 2007 soll ein B 52- (Langstrecken-) Bomber "versehentlich" mit Atomwaffen an Bord über die USA geflogen sein. Jedenfalls melden es Mainstream-Medien so, ohne in die Tiefe zu gehen und zu fragen, ob sowas überhaupt möglich ist und welche Scherheitsprocederes dem entgegenwirken sollen. Sodass man zum Schluss kommt, dass es von oberer Stelle angeordnet worden und man es dann auch an Medien durchsickern liess - um Menschen in Angst zu versetzen, sie einzustimmen auf Kommendes?
Drei Tages-Blitzkrieg-Pan gegen den Iran (2.9.2007): "The various components of the military operation are firmly under US Command, coordinated by the Pentagon and US Strategic Command Headquarters (USSTRATCOM) at the Offutt Air Force base in Nebraska. The actions announced by Israel would be carried out in close coordination with the Pentagon. The command structure of the operation is centralized and ultimately Washington will decide when to launch the military operation. US military sources have confirmed that an aerial attack on Iran would involve a large scale deployment comparable to the US "shock and awe" bombing raids on Iraq in March 2003:
American air strikes on Iran would vastly exceed the scope of the 1981 Israeli attack on the Osiraq nuclear center in Iraq, and would more resemble the opening days of the 2003 air campaign against Iraq. Using the full force of operational B-2 stealth bombers, staging from Diego Garcia or flying direct from the United States, possibly supplemented by F-117 stealth fighters staging from al Udeid in Qatar or some other location in theater, the two-dozen suspect nuclear sites would be targeted. Military planners could tailor their target list to reflect the preferences of the Administration by having limited air strikes that would target only the most crucial facilities ... or the United States could opt for a far more comprehensive set of strikes against a comprehensive range of WMD related targets, as well as conventional and unconventional forces that might be used to counterattack against US forces in Iraq. (im Artikel sind noch weitere Links mit Infos).
Nun Normans Text:
Discredited fringe elements and agent provocateurs, with their extreme rantings and divisive attacks, often deflect attention from genuine concerns. Detractors attempting to undermine the credibility of the Kennebunkport Warning - an impeachment petition intended to avert a second 9/11 – should take care that they do not meet their own demise when the sky actually does fall.
There have been many alerts that a new false-flag attack may be imminent. Threats by Vice President Cheney and the “gut feelings” of ghoulish Homeland Security honcho Michael Chertoff forewarn of a major attack or multiple attacks, possibly with nuclear weapons.
It should also be remembered that in February, former National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski explicitly warned a Senate Foreign Relations Committee that a staged provocation or a false flag terror attack could launch an attack on Iran.
Since Cheney's USSTRATCOM contingency plan calls for attacking Iran after a 'second 9/11' - no matter who is behind it – a new act of state-sponsored terrorism would clearly trigger the expansion of the global domination project described in neoconservative policy documents, and would certainly be used to impose martial law in the US in accordance with draconian executive orders already in place.
Knowing, as we do, that 9/11 and 7/7, as well as the Bali bombings, were false-flag attacks of state terrorism, blamed on pseudo Islamist patsies to justify hegemonic intervention in strategic and resource -rich lands - we can rationally expect that the next major attack might also be a covert false-flag operation; the needed pretext to whip up war hysteria as the well-prepared attack on Iran is launched.
Australia may not, on the face of it, seem the most likely place for such a false flag provocation to occur, yet serious concern that the anticipated attack may be imminent is causing many Sydney residents to flee the city as the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation forum begins (APEC 2007, September 2-9).
With high-level representatives from 21 countries including US President George Bush, China's President Hu Jintao and Russian President Vladimir Putin, the city is in lockdown mode.
David Rowlands points out that APEC has always been the whip-wielding road show of the “new world order”, pushing a neoliberal free trade agenda and ruthlessly crushing dissent along the way.
“Three-metre high security fences, heart-stopping tasers, a bone-smashing water cannon, mobile prison buses and — perhaps most disturbing of all — the threat of automatic incarceration for randomly abducted protesters? Welcome to the growing international phenomenon of ‘population control’. The Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) forum is in Sydney, and NSW security chiefs are telling you to follow orders, shut up and stay away. Prison cells are ready and waiting if you fail to heed the warning.”
One reason given by security forces for keeping demonstrators at bay is that they seem to have “lost” nine M-72 rocket launchers. These are designed for maximum "blast effect" and carry warheads that can cut through metal and then explode. The nine rocket launchers were allegedly stolen from a private storage facility then placed in PVC piping and buried in the national park between Sydney and Wollongong.
Sydneysiders are warned to have their “Go-bags” ready containing shoes, torch, radio and first aid kit so that they will be prepared - when the expected attack occurs. Loudspeakers ringing the fenced city centre will bark instructions to be followed - when the expected attack occurs. Prisons have been emptied in preparation for mass arrests - when the expected attack occurs. A mysterious outbreak of “horse flu” has mean that the normal mounted police will not be able to operate. Instead, 1,500 Australian Defence personnel are running security operations and are prepared for the expected attack.
With a "Bums Not Bombs'' group planning to show their regard with a mass mooning, and violent provocateurs expected, President Bush is leaving the forum a day early, causing a flutter as the closing photo-op with all representatives dressed in their traditional costume had to be brought forward. If the horse flu seems a little strange to some observers, it also strikes concern that the absence of President Bush at the culminating event on 9/9, which brings together the leaders of all major regional economies, as well as thousands of delegates and international media for the APEC Economic Leaders Meeting (AELM), may perhaps be strangely “convenient”.
Warnings of a serious imminent attack, extreme security measures, evacuation of the city, emptying of the prisons, sick horses and an early departing Bush may be enough to give nervous types a dose of the jitters, but they are far short of evidence of a false-flag explosion in the Sydney Opera House. It has been brilliantly documented by historian Webster Griffin Tarpley and others, that both the 9/11 and the 7/7 false-flag operations were carried out under the guise of military drills that went live and also served as a cover. So it is a little chilling to see that major naval warfare exercises are also taking place at exactly the same time as the Sydney APEC conference.
As wargames with Nato warships and the South African Navy get under way off the South African coast, the chiefs of defence from all 26 NATO countries are scheduled to meet in Victoria, Canada, from September 7-9. At the same time, a five-nation naval warfare drill, codenamed Malabar CY 07-2, the 13th Malabar exercise, is beginning in the Bay of Bengal on India's eastern seaboard. It is the biggest-ever joint naval exercise in Asia with the US, Australia, India, Japan and Singapore participating in a so-called “quadrilateral” alliance.
Under the terms of this alliance, India would acquire the status of US allies like Japan and South Korea, and US warships and planes could use the facilities of Indian ports and airbases for refuelling, maintenance, servicing and communications during offensive operations, such as the planned attack on Iran. The US Navy will have the largest representation during Malabar 13 with 13 warships, including the aircraft carrier USS Nimitz and the USS Kitty Hawk, the nuclear submarine USS Chicago, two guided-missile cruisers, and six guided-missile destroyers. The USS Nimitz, armed with nuclear weapons, was used extensively in “Operation Iraqi Freedom” in 2003 for aerial bombardment and launching cruise missiles, which killed thousands of people in Iraq.
Some of the exercises will be conducted just off the choke points of the Straits of Hormuz and Bab-el-Mandeb through which most of the world’s oil supply passes. Malabar 12, held in October 2006, when hundreds of US and allied war ships gathered in the strategic seas of the Middle East and India was described by Debka file as having as its primary mission to prepare for a US-led military strike against Iran. Debka reports that Iranian officials were seriously rattled that one of the US warships was spotted heading for the Persian Gulf, prompting fears of an imminent American military assault.
India has assured critics that the naval exercise has “no military overtones.” But it is perhaps significant that the Malabar naval exercise follows hard on the heels of the final stage of a joint Russian-Chinese anti-terror drill, "Peace Mission 2007”, sponsored by the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO). With hints of a possible false-flag attack during the Sydney APEC meeting and sabre-rattling military manoeuvres taking place, one day stands out as a day of particular concern – the day of George Bush’s absence at the APEC meeting.
Despite the reluctance of many to consider the dank occult underbelly of the New World Order, there is certain compelling evidence that secret societies to which major world leaders are beholden will leave occult 'signatures' so that those who have eyes to see and ears to hear might recognise who is directing the course of history. Like dogs pissing on a tree, they mark significant world events with many signs “hidden in plain view”. Besides the overwhelming scientific, circumstancial and eye-witness evidence of foul-play in the false-flag attacks of recent years, these signatures also tell us that the attacks were not designed by Muslims, but were dark deceptions of high-level occultists.
On that day, the closure of the APEC summit will be marked by tall ships sailing across the Sydney Harbour in a display named "River of Fire", reserved for VIP eyes only. On New Year's Eve in Sydney, 2003, as the clock struck midnight, a man-of-war ship sailed towards Harbour Bridge firing red fireworks that stained the water and air like blood, as an amplified voice called out, “Cry ‘havoc’ and let slip the dogs of war!”
Perhaps to be taken with a grain of salt, but then, who knows – TBR News December 27, 2006, the (supposed) Voice of the White House comments that President George Bush, evidently rather grumpy with Australia’s reluctance to charge into battle in Iraq, referred to his Aussie allies in an official memo, as “a bunch of ex-con kangaroo humpers”. The Voice writes: “…let us consider the deadly Bali bombing on October 12, 2002. The blast was centered in a nightclub area known to be heavily frequented by Australians. The damage was tremendous with at least 400 being killed.
This was stated in the media, from official announcements, to be a terrorist attack by an Indonesian group with links to Al Queada but this, according to the file, is not correct, although a number of locals were promptly arrested, tried and convicted for this. (Convictions were eventually overturned by the Indonesian high court)
In fact, this atrocity has strong parallels with the 9/11 attacks according to the contents of the CIA files. It seems that President Bush requested the Australian Prime Minister, John Howard, to “volunteer” Australian troops for his forthcoming attack on Iraq, five months in the future. Howard responded that while he was willing, support for the U.S. attack was badly lacking among the Australians and he anticipated problems with his government in such a project.
Bush does not like to be crossed and when the Prime Minister said that public support of the U.S. position was weak, he said that …”maybe your people should realize that terrorism knows no borders and I would hope that these crazies don’t attack you.” Howard replied, according to the transcripts of the conversation, that in the case of a perceived Muslim attack on Australians, he would certainly have the full support of his Australians.
The resulting attack was the second one planned. The first consisted of placing a special explosive device (see the Harring account) in an Australian public building. Fortunately for the population of Sydney, it failed to go off and is still in place. Perhaps Sydney opera lovers should make sure their insurance policies are up to date. The second one went off in October in an area where many Australians were known to visit and the results are well known.” 88 Australian died in this Bali bombing of October 12, 2002.
During the month of August 2007, the Australian Army Chief, Lt. Gen. Peter Leahy, stated that a secret meeting of the Army Chiefs from 19 countries had been held in Sydney. “There is a lot going on in Sydney,” he said, “and we don’t want to make a fuss.” The conference was billed as the “Pacific Countries Army Chiefs’ Conference” and it was jointly organised by the US and Australia. India’s vice chief of Army attended the meeting. So did the US Army Chief of Staff.
Well, we don’t like to make a fuss either, so let's hope and pray that 9/11 and 7/7 will not be followed by Sydney 9/9, as the crazed dogs of war, snapping and howling with impatience for the next false-flag, long to slip the leash and cry havoc in the unfortunate nations they so passionately desire to devour.
As a member of the Australian 9/11 Truth Movement, (www.911oz.com), and as director of AvanteFilms producing a feature documentary on 9/11 and American Empire, “SHADOWPLAY: 9/11, Deception & Dominion”, (www.shadowplay.info), I endorse the Kennebunkport Warning of an possible imminent false-flag attack as a provocation to justify US military intervention in Iran.
Gillian Norman
INFOS:
APEC
APEC 2007
APEC: road show of the ‘new world order’
APEC News
NATO-Treffen in Kanada
Australian Homeland Security - Terror Threats and Warnings
Australian Homeland Security Preparedness
Sydney Residents Urged to Vacate Amid APEC Security
APEC security fear: Who's got the rocket launchers?
Prepare a Go Bag
Australian horse flu hobbles APEC security plans
What’s The Big Fuss Over Malabar Exercise?
Biggest war games in Bay of Bengal
US-Led Military Thrust Focuses Heavily on Broad Naval Deployment
In Your Face: The Globalists' Language is Hidden in Plain View
The Voice of the White House
Mein
Feedback-Beitrag zu diesem Artikel |
|
